Tag Archives: social media

The Refugee Challenge

I have a challenge for you.

I want you to think about how much media you have consumed about the Syrian refugee crisis. You probably spent several hours reading about it before the events in Paris even took place. I’m guessing your entire Friday evening was spent glued to Twitter, Facebook, or your favorite news source, watching the events unfold in real time.

Since then, you’ve probably spent hours on Facebook seeing memes and opinions splashed about, as well as read multiple informative articles on the subject.

Now. How much time have you spent reading your Bible and praying about the issue?

As my audience is mostly Christian, I’m guessing you have spent some time exploring what God has to say. However, I’m going to propose that VERY FEW OF YOU have spent as much time in the Word and in prayer as you have online reading news and opinions. I certainly haven’t.

So here’s my challenge: Start to bridge that gap.

Open your Bible. Pray that God would show you what He wants you to see. Read. Find every verse that talks about anything related to the refugee crisis. What does the Bible say about immigrants? What does the Bible say about personal safety? What does the Bible say about Muslims? It’s all fair game.

I was going to only issue this challenge to Christians, but I changed my mind. Non-Christians, why don’t you start reading too? Read what the Bible says, and ask yourself this: do the Christians you know really believe their own book?

That’s the extent of the challenge. I’m not asking you to agree with me. I’m not asking you to vote for something or not vote for something else.

Just read your Bible. Pray.

That’s it.

What you do afterwords is between you and God.


About Last Blog Post, and Other Things

Okay, I have a few topics to cover today. I have homework to do but I feel like doing a blog post instead, so I’ll indulge myself. 🙂

Topic #1: My Latest Blog Post

First let me say that yes, I am aware that I misspelled “obsession” as “obession” in the title of my blog post. I found it humorous and ironic, but I was kind of annoyed that, even when I fixed it on my blog, the misspelling lived a long un-fixable life on Facebook. I imagined that everyone saw it but couldn’t point it out for fear of coming across as a fake intellectual. 😀

The blog post had one of the most interesting responses I have ever received. Some of the response was expected, and some was quite unexpected.

My post perched on the edge of devaluing education and intelligence in general. I toyed with the idea of putting in lots of disclaimers about how important education is, and how I think intelligence is a worthy thing to aspire to, but in the end I didn’t because that wasn’t what the blog post was about.

I expected this to slightly bother some people who really do value intelligence, and like to read and share things that make them think. I thought I might make them paranoid that their very real aspirations to learn more would be perceived as “fake.” And I did get a little of that, though not as much as I was afraid I might.

So maybe I’ll add one disclaimer: I you are a “fake intellectual” at heart but are sharing things that are actually interesting and bring more information to the world as a whole, while being respectful to those who disagree with you, then great. I don’t like “fakeness,” but I do think good things can come from a place of fakeness. For instance, being kind to someone you don’t like.

However, things that establish your intelligence primarily by labeling an entire group of people as “stupid” have got to go.

There were, however, two very unexpected responses that pleased me immensely.

First, several people admitted that the post hit really close to home for them. I don’t think you guys understand how rare this is. We have a tendency to construct a reality around ourselves, applaud the things that fit this reality, and squirm away silently from the things that don’t. I don’t think I have EVER written something that said, essentially, “you’re doing something wrong,” and had the response be, “oh, you’re right, I am.”

In fact, I don’t know if I have ever responded this way to something I read. The things that actually change my mind usually happen from a slow chipping away at existing ideas. Or, if I do suddenly realize that I’m wrong, I don’t usually have the guts to advertise it.

The other thing that surprised/pleased me was that I got a few private messages about the post.

I’ve often wondered about how the dynamics of blogging (especially blogging about controversy) would change if the only “commenting” option were to message the author directly. Now, I know what you’re thinking. “You should just try it! Disable comments! Tell people not to comment!”

Well, the thing is, many people depend on Facebook to see my posts, and if no one comments on Facebook not nearly as many of my friends will see that I’ve even posted. Yeah, stupid Facebook algorithms. Oh well. I really do like comments, so I don’t mind.

However, private messages are also very nice. So, if you have something to say about my post that you don’t necessarily want to make open to general discussion, feel free to message me on Facebook or send me an email. But also, comment. Either one works. (Or both.)

Topic #2: Contact Information

I added a “contact” tab for that exact reason. My email address has always lurked somewhere around the blog, but I decided to lodge it in an easy-to-find location.

Topic #3: About Me

I keep clicking on the blog links of people who comment on or like my posts, and then being disappointed to find that they have little-to-no “about me” information.

Well hello kettle, my name is pot, because I also have little-to-no “about me” information. You’d think that if I’m narcissistic enough to blog about myself I’d take pleasure in constructing a lengthy essay about who I am. But it still feels weird.

Any help from you on this matter would be appreciated. How do you decide how to describe yourself? When you read the “about me” page of bloggers, what info are you hoping to find?

The Obsession of Avoiding Stupidity

Do you remember how it feels when they find out that you’re actually stupid?

I do.

I remember the day they discovered that I didn’t know where Honolulu was. When they found out that I didn’t know the freezing temperature of water. When they snickered in the corner because I thought that a bacon cheeseburger just had bacon on it for the meat, and no hamburger.

Clear memories, etched deep into my brain, because that’s what I was insecure about as a teen. I wasn’t insecure about my looks or my popularity or all those other things girls in books were insecure about, but I was insecure about my intellect. I even wrote myself a list of “Rules for Learning Things Without Looking Stupid.”

(Tip #1: If you don’t know something, don’t ask. Look it up on Google later. Tip #2: If you don’t get the joke, pretend you just think the joke is stupid.)

Now, thankfully that insecurity is in the past. I fully see the mean-spiritedness of acting like a joke is stupid so that I don’t look stupid.


In this social media era, nearly everyone, to some degree, presents the person they want to be online instead of the person they are. Right? I mean, this isn’t new. People talk about this phenomenon all the time. But for me, the temptation isn’t to be fake-perfect-housekeeper or fake-adventurer or fake-comedian, the temptation is to be fake-intellectual.

So maybe that’s why the fakers online that I see through the most are the fake-intellectuals.

Definition of Fake Intellectual: Someone whose primary motivation behind their social media post is showing the world how smart they are, or that they are smarter than a large segment of the population.

And they’re everywhere. EVERYWHERE. Like I said, even I am not exempt from the ranks. But it really bothers me.

Think about it. All those memes mocking republicans, mocking democrats, mocking people who say dumb stuff online. “You can’t fix stupid,” many of them say.

I guess that proves you’re in the smarter half of the population, doesn’t it?

Every time there’s a video of someone being very stupid in a semi-believable way, it goes viral. Usually those videos are just someone trolling, and yet the people who share it believe its true. It makes them feel smart by comparison.

Those quizzes you took that said you were a “genius,” or had “100% common sense,” or were a “grammar wizard.” Why did you take them? Why did you share the results on your wall?

You get to feel smart with the click of a “share” button. But even going beyond that, into blog posts people write, into long status updates where people give their well-thought-out opinion on a current issue…often, the writers take the people who disagree with them and shove them into the box labeled “stupidity.”

So why is it that we all have this fear of being stupid, and this great desire to prove that we’re not? Why are we trying so hard to be perceived as a member of the smarter half of the population?

I don’t know. But I have a theory:

Being smart is the only hierarchical system we have left.

Today, it is no longer acceptable to believe that you are better than someone else because of your gender, age, race, social class, or any of a myriad of things that people have used in the past to organize themselves into hierarchies. But you are allowed, on some unspoken level, to believe that you’re better than someone else because you’re smarter than they are.


In my Population Geography class, it’s kind of understood that women having 2.1 children on average is “good,” and women having 5 or so children on average is “bad.” However, this raises a sticky situation for a PC classroom. When women do have 5 children on average, what are you going to blame it on?

On Tuesday, my professor brought up the sticky subject of religion. Does religion affect fertility? To answer the question, he showed a video, in which someone split the world up into majority Christian countries, majority Muslim countries, and majority Eastern Religion countries, showing that all three groups have declining population.

This was somehow supposed to prove that religion doesn’t affect birthrate at all. It struck me as very weird and unscientific for a class that is driven by data.

My professor then played a humorous video for us. It contrasted a well-educated couple in NYC with an overweight bumbling couple somewhere in Appalachia.  The “smart” couple kept putting off having children because the economy wasn’t right or the wife wanted to focus on her career. The “dumb” couple had lots of kids and drank beer and their sons were football stars and slept around and that family tree exploded.

So it was funny, I guess, but the implications of it left an odd taste in my mouth.

If 2.1 children-per-woman is “good” and 5 children-per-women is “bad,” we can’t blame it on religion. That would indicate that one religious preference is “bad” and one is “good.”

However, we can blame it on stupidity. Smart is “good” and stupid is “bad.” We all know that.

I’m not standing up in defense of stupidity. But real stupidity is building a false pedestal of intellect by marginalizing another group of people as idiotic for not believing like me.

Stupidity is thinking, “if only those people had access to my information, they would believe like I do.”

Stupidity is saying, “Someone needs to tell those dumb liberals that climate change is a natural cycle.” “Someone needs to tell those moronic conservatives that planned parenthood is necessary for poor women to get access to contraception.” “Surely if the stupids had my superior info they ought to believe like I do.”

You can’t fix stupid by yelling at people who disagree with you. You can only begin to fix stupid by looking inside and seeing it.

I am stupid.

But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty.